Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Pokey Chatman Update

Thank heaven for the anonymous comment function. A report just in from Baton Rouge (I think -- the writer seems familiar enough with the campus) adds nuance to the picture of the Pokey Chatman resignation. This short essay was originally posted to the comments section of my previous article, but it has enough of a new perspective to deserve a more prominent place on the blog. Tiger321 writes:

"Along with remembering that most of what's been reported is based on rumor, we should also keep in mind that the media doesn't (and perhaps can't) give the whole story. One aspect that's been mostly left out in the coverage of this saga is that there are in fact people who are supporting Pokey. LSU's campus newspaper today included an article in which a former player (who remains anonymous) does--however tactfully--defend Chatman. Also in the news today, Sylvia Fowles's comments to the press following the NCAA Selection Show last night were nothing if not supportive of Pokey. And Fowles and the anonymous former player are joined by numerous fans, at LSU and in Baton Rouge in general, who have no direct contact with the media and so, naturally, wouldn't be included in the coverage.

"The other thing that seems to be (completely) absent from the issues raised by the media and blogging communities like this one is that, should the rumors prove to be true, there is still no basis for LSU 'forcing' Pokey to resign. If her resignation was indeed of her own accord, fine--that is a separate issue. But, if her resignation was, as the rumor goes, the result of the report of her having a sexual relationship with a player and the subsequent investigation, then a different problem arises. I'm not going to jump in on the debate over the ethics of sex with students/players. I will, however, point out that LSU does not have a non-fraternization policy (though they are now working on creating one). I know of university professors here who have had 'relations' with both graduate and undergraduate students. I also know of LSU graduate TAs who have had sexual relationships with undergraduates. While these relationships are all 'frowned upon' by the university, they are not prohibited. I've looked, fruitlessly thus far, for an NCAA policy prohibiting fraternization, which could, in a pinch, explain (logically) LSU's handling of the matter. But without such an excuse, I'm inclined to believe the 'conspiracy theory'-esque lines of thinking that Pokey is no longer at LSU because she is a woman, or because she is black, or because she is gay, or perhaps all three."

Let me say too that this Radical has always been against policies that prohibit fraternization (a fabulous euphemism) for two reasons. The first is I am against policing in situations that are not inherently criminal: because a relationship *could* harm someone is not a reason to prohibit it, particularly when everyone involved is sexually mature and the pleasure in the relationship is mutual. People are routinely harmed by being married to the wrong person...oh don't worry. I won't start again. But I think it is one of the bad lessons of feminism that power imbalance in a relationship makes the person of lesser power inherently incapable of previous knowledge about the situation s/he is entering into, choice or reasonable consent. Or that the heartbreak suffered at the end of the relationship is inherently more painful and damaging than in a relationship where equality reigns.

But the other, more important, reason is: research shows that overwhelmingly, those who are disciplined under such regulations are lesbians and black men, and that the regulations themselves become as great a site of injustice and inequity as the relationships they are supposed to discourage. So putting such regulations in place creates yet another arena for letting another, possibly more pernicious, set of power relationships to play out, with permanent consequences for livelihoods and reputations.

*********************************

Relevant update on my Atlanta bed and breakfast: I was discussing the Chatman situation last night with the gang at the inn as an alternative to talking about history and/or the President. And the innkeeper, a woman who is nearly sixty, told me that she had an affair with her dissertation advisor thirty years ago. Subsequently they were married, but they continue to live in separate houses to this day. Hence, the former dissertation director was not there to explain his torrid past.

7 comments:

Carol Anne said...

The Women's Basketball Coaches Association (to which Pokey belongs) does have a ethics policy forbidding personal and social fraternization between coaches and players.

I think that's wise.

MCALDWELLC said...

I think it is wise to allow consenting adults to make their own choices regarding who they choose to be sexually involved with.

One of my favorite quotes:
"The brain may take advice, but not the heart, and love, having no geography, knows no boundaries; weight and sink it deep, no matter, it will rise and find the surface: and why not? any love is natural and beautiful that is within a person's nature; only hypocrites would hold a man responsible for what he loves, emotional illiterates and those of righteous envy who, in their agitated concern mistake so frequently the arrow pointing to heaven for the one that leads to hell."
Truman Capote Other Voices Other Rooms

Becky C. said...

I blogged on this a while back after also contacting someone I know familiar with goings on at LSU. My opinion has not really changed since then.

Fraternization with a former player--not the best thing--but if there were no rules against it should not have caused a necessary resignation at all--as you say--I know professors who have married and lived with former students.

The real problem as I see it is the implicit denial there are lesbians in women's basketball--which, is of course absurd, and the "don't ask don't tell policy" at the colleges.

It was an "open secret" that Chatman was lez oriented--and you don't need a real sensitive gaydar to get that impression.

If she had been able to live openly it seems to me likely this problem never would have developed. She could have expanded her social network beyond the small basketball community.

But, what this is all doing is flaming the stereotype of the lesbian predator. I am pretty sure the former player was already oriented that way. And, of course, the basketball players are in no more inherent danger from Chatman than the male assistant coach.

But, there is the (usually) unspoken fear that innoncent girls are being molested and converted into homosexuals by the lesbian coach. And a number of families then have even more fears about their daughters participating.

It is right that the college make a distinction between gender orientation and sexual misconduct. But, it is equally important that they be upfront all gender orientaion and that the old fearful myths be dissipated. In this case they are just being perpetuated.

~Becky

Taneisha said...

Not former "player", former players. Plural. She had sexual relationships with more than one player and they were not "former" at the time of the incidents. They were current players under her tutelage. This was obvisously a pattern with this coach. If it had truly been one tryst, I don't think it would have been blown into such a media frenzy. I am amused that the former player is deciding to hide behind a cloak of anonymity. What retribution, if any, is there for her to openly support her former coach? Something doesn't seem right there. Do you really think the press would have been more lenient had it been a male coach sleeping with his female players?

tiger321 said...

A quick update:

The LSU campus newspaper (also available online) has published two articles in the past two days about Pokey's resignation. Both articles stem from a letter sent to LSU's general counsel by Pokey's lawyer. The first article (published yesterday) includes a link to the letter itself. While many "big" questions about the situation remain unanswered, the letter does contain some interesting implications. I won't expound on them here, but instead offer a link to Tuesday's article which is in turn linked to the letter:

(http://media.www.lsureveille.com/media/storage/paper868/news/2007/04/17/Sports/Lawyer.Chatman.Is.prepared.To.Go.Forward.With.Litigation-2847104.shtml)

As a side note: I have heard since my last post that the WBCA has a non-fraternization policy, but have been unable to find it anywhere. Carol Anne, if you're still reading this, can you direct me to the policy?

wangzi said...

When it comes to the luxury accessories, fashion Louis Vuitton first comes up with my brain. It is high time we farewelled the cold winter and welcomed spring with full arms. Also it is high time we reorganized our wardrobes and took out some outfits that were suitable for spring and accessories used to match the outfits.

Buy Cialis said...

I think it is one of the bad lessons of feminism that power imbalance in a relationship makes the person of lesser power inherently incapable of previous knowledge about the situation is entering into, choice or reasonable consent. Or that the heartbreak suffered at the end of the relationship is inherently more painful and damaging than in a relationship where equality reigns.
Thanks